I’ve been working on branding/rebranding projects for over a decade, and most of them involve logo redesign. While we all know the importance of great logo design, do we know what makes a great logo? One of the most common question from my client meetings would be - what is great logo? How do you differentiate between a mediocre and a great logo? For the longest time I’d say, ‘you know it when you see one’ or ‘the great logos are simple and sticky’.
I know ‘you know it when you see it’ might not be the best reply. This post is my attempt to articulate my answer and share my learnings from all these years of logo work. To make it easier to follow, I’ll be taking you through a logo redesign project and see if it qualifies for a good logo.
In this post we wont’ talk about the logos of Nike and Apple. Instead, we’ll be looking at the logo design for Prefinery - a no-code referral tool. The brief was to make the Prefinery brand contemporary with tech look and feel.
I really dig rebranding projects, and you can read the reasons here :). Whether you are rebranding a law-firm or a B2B SaaS product, the underlying brand principles are the same. Here is the old logo for Prefinery:
The logo wasn’t accessible, and lacked the tech/SaaS vibe. The objective of this rebranding exercise was to fix these issues for the Prefinery brand and to create something more exciting and dynamic. With these clear goals in mind, I briefed an art director who has worked with me on several logo designs in the past ten years.
A couple of logos initially presented were:
These initial logos were around the concept of ‘connections and referral’. The concept was on point, but these designs didn’t have the minimal, bold and tech vibe the brand needed. The designer kept the ‘P’ from the current logo and I quite liked it, but that wasn’t a requirement.
We went back to the drawing board, and decided to explore ‘launch’ as a concept. Prefinery is about launch, and it could be more exciting than connections.
After a couple of attempts, we arrived at this option:
This was a very good design, I really liked it (as well as the client) and we were getting close (you know it when you see it). It was right on the money and it is dynamic - it shows take off/launch, and also cues a positive emotion. At this stage, I decided to get some feedback from a few people in the target audience. Feedback is important because we all have our biases, and it helps get different perspectives. Talking about different perspectives, see these two comments on the above logo:
I could have ignored the question mark bit but the ‘penis’ comment was important to address. Everyone loved the logo concept (launch/growth), and the first draft of the logo was not bad. But we needed to make it simpler, and address some of the feedback.
After a couple of days of iteration, the art director delivered this final logo:
What do you think? Is this a great logo? Let’s evaluate it as per the framework from the iconic logo design book - Logo Design Love. As per the book, these are the essentials for a great logo:
It is so unbelievably rare these days for a business to be meaningfully differentiated through its technology, or even its UX, alone. Emily Hayward Context switching is the enemy # 1 to high-quality work. And I've observed that most of it happens in the browser. For the last couple of years I've been trying to […]
I've worked with several founders over the years as a product/marketing strategist. Though these projects were spread across different industries and geographies, most of them had a common problem - the founder's fear of branding. From my experience, most founders are intimidated by branding. They'll keep branding for the end - mostly reduced to a […]